January 1, 2015

Seventh Circuit Overturns Conviction in Fake Stash House Case

Share it Please


In a decision issued yesterday, the Seventh Circuit held that the defendant in a fake “stash house robbery” case was entitled to present an entrapment defense to the jury. The case came from what was essentially a set-up by the government: they created a fake stash house, and used a paid informant to recruit the defendant as part of a crew to rob the house.

Prior to the case going to trial, the judge ruled that the defendant could not present the defense of entrapment, holding that there was not enough evidence to show the government induced the crime, or that the defendant lacked the predisposition to commit it.

To use an entrapment defense, the defendant has to who two things:

That he lacked the predisposition to commit the crime; andHe would not have attempted to commit the crime without the government inducing him into committing it.

It’s important to note that the Seventh Circuit didn’t rule that the defendant was entrapped, just that he should have been able to argue to the jury that he was entrapped. From the opinion:

Here, Mayfield proffered enough evidence to justify giving the issue to the jury. He provided some facts showing that he was not predisposed to commit the charged crimes prior to being approached by the informant, and he narrated a story of substantial government inducement going beyond the mere offer of a chance to rob a stash house. His story may be false or unpersuasive, but that’s for the jury to decide. The district court erred by crediting the government’s evidence over Mayfield’s and precluding the entrapment defense before trial.
We vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.

photo credit: Nuwandalice via photopin cc

Sam began his legal career at one of the largest law firms in Florida, working directly for national insurance companies and health care conglomerates. This valuable experience gives him a definitive edge in knowing how insurers will fight against compensating you for your claim. He then moved to one of the top statewide plaintiff’s firms, gaining insight into insurance coverage and insurance bad faith matters. He joined with Brett Metcalf to begin Metcalf Harden in 2014. Sam is a member of the Florida Justice Association, the American Association for Justice, the Tampa Bay Trial Lawyers Association, and the Hillsborough County Bar Association. He is licensed to practice in all Florida state courts, as well as the federal Middle District of Florida. Sam lives in Lutz with his wife Kristin, a Tampa native, and son Robbie.

Read all posts by Sam Harden


Developed in partnership with SanFran Coders.


The acronyms DUI, DWI, OMVI and OVI all refer to the same thing: operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The most commonly used terms are DUI, an acronym for Driving Under the Influence, and DWI, an acronym for Driving While Impaired.
© Copyright 2010 - 2015 MY OVI | Developed by San Fran Coders