In the hearing to rescind a statutory summary suspension, the defendant must first present a prima facie case for rescission, then the state must overcome this by presenting evidence justifying the suspension. People v. McClure, 218 Ill.2d 375 (2006). In the rescission hearing, the question that often needs to be asked is whether the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that you were driving a vehicle under the influence.
Reasonable grounds in the rescission hearing is identical to the probable cause standard in the criminal matter of a DUI. Probable cause for an arrest exists when the totality of the circumstances, known to the officer, are such that a reasonably prudent person would believe you committed a crime. People v. Rodriguez-Chavez, 405 Ill.App.3d 872 (2d Dist 2010). Therefore, the judge will have to decide whether the officer had probable cause to arrest you for DUI.
Each DUI arrest is factually different from each other. This reasonable grounds standard does not have a threshold that must be crossed for the arrest to be legal. Instead, the court will look to all of the factors surrounding the arrest to determine if there was reasonable grounds to believe that you were driving under the influence.
In one instance, the defendant admitted to speeding after drinking a few beers earlier in the day. People v. O'Brien, 227 Ill.App.3d 302 (2d Dist. 1992). He also failed one-leg stand and the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. However, the defendant testified that he was not under the influence while he was driving. In the end, the court found his testimony more credible than the arresting officer and ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest the defendant for a DUI. This is an example of how credibility can sway the ruling in the courtroom.
In People v. Lukach, 263 Ill.App.3d 318 (2d Dist. 1994), there was a single-car accident. The defendant suffered a head injury in the accident. The arresting officer did not allege any odor of alcohol on the breath of the defendant nor did he claim there were bloodshot or watery eyes. Like in O'Brien, the court found that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest or even test the defendant for driving under the influence. However, unlike O'Brien, this ruling was based off of the officer's own observations at the scene and not his credibility.
There was also no probable cause to arrest in People v. Boomer, 325 Ill.App.3d 206 (2d Dist. 2001). Here, the defendant admitted to drinking, reeked of alcohol, and laid his motorcycle down. Witnesses claimed that he had not been driving erratically and the court noted that motorcycles are more prone to hazards on the roads that could lead to accidents.
These are just a few of the many ways a skilled DUI attorney will challenge a statutory summary suspension of their client's drivers license. Do not miss out on your chance to keep your driving privileges!
Categories: DUI - Challenging the Traffic Stop Permalink | Email This Post Posted In: DUI - Challenging the Traffic Stop Connect
Contact Us FREE CONSULTATION(309) 734-1001 Name: Email: Phone: Message:
February 24, 2015
Reasonable Grounds or a Hunch?
In the hearing to rescind a statutory summary suspension, the defendant must first present...
November 15, 2014
The Confrontation Clause in Illinois DUI Cases
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right for the accused...
November 13, 2014
Is it legal to avoid DUI Roadblocks?
Avoiding Roadblocks Often, motorists will seek to avoid roadblocks for a variety of reasons....
April 23, 2014
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO KNOWINGLY POSSESS?
The Cannabis Control Act states, "It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess cannabis"...
March 25, 2014
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT CANNABIS CHARGES AND PENALTIES
The penalties and fines for possession, distribution, growing, and driving under the influence (DUI) of...
October 8, 2013
RECKLESS DRIVING GUIDE FOR DUI AND TRAFFIC LAW PRACTITIONERS IN ILLINOIS
You are prepared to try your client's DUI case. You are looking forward to the...
\ABS\Auto Blog Samurai\data\DUI blog by Peter Drill\Illinois DUI\badge-ncdd.png)
The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law, nor does it recognize certifications of expertise in any phase of the practice of law by any agency, governmental or private, or by any group, organization or association.
\ABS\Auto Blog Samurai\data\DUI blog by Peter Drill\Illinois DUI\militarybutton.png)
MONMOUTH OFFICE
122 W Boston Ave
Monmouth, IL 61462
Phone: (309) 734-1001
Fax: (309) 734-1005
BETTENDORF OFFICE
Quad City Office
Northwest Bank Tower
2550 Middle Rd #300
Bettendorf, IA 52722
Phone: (309) 734-1001
Fax: (309) 734-1005
PEORIA OFFICE
809 W Detweiller Dr,
#800
Peoria, IL 61615
Phone: (309) 221-4292
Fax: (309) 734-1005
