Showing posts with label Coach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coach. Show all posts

February 9, 2015

Coach Belichick- An Explanation of Football Deflation and Determining BAC

On January 22, 2015, Bill Belichick gave a very extensive explanation as to how he figured out why the New England Patriots had nothing to do with 11 out of the 12 game balls found to be 1.5 to 2.0 psi (pounds per square inch) below the league regulations of 12.5- 13.5 psi.  While watching the press conference, if one replaced psi with BAC (blood alcohol content), he could have been describing how hard it is to measure and predict BAC.  Taking no side as to what happened or who may be to blame, we will take a look at some of the scientific arguments Coach Belichick used to argue that he had "no idea what happened."

Coach Belichick's general explanation is that the conditioning of the footballs, the rubbing process to get the correct texture of the ball, is what primarily lead to an artificial raising of the psi within the ball.  He used the explanation of turning on your car on a winter morning, and seeing the "low tire pressure" light on. Then, after driving a couple miles, the tires warm up and the light goes off.  So just like the tires warm up, the footballs warm and the psi in the ball is increased.

This is similar to the conditions that an individual may face when drinking.  Now, I'm not talking about a low level equipment manager rubbing your belly until you warm up.  But other conditions that go into an individuals state before drinking- food, other drinks, and metabolism.  For instance, eating a giant plate of mom's linguini and clam sauce before drinking will have a different effect than eating a fruit cup.  Similarly, an aerobic athlete, for instance a long distance runner, will process alcohol differently that a 350 lb. financial adviser whose only exercise is getting up to get another package of Girl Scout cookies.

Second, Coach Belichick said that, "the balls are different- they are not manmade."  He then corrected himself- the balls are made of natural leather, even if put together by men.  They are also comprised of seams, laces, and the air hole- all of which are variables which can affect a ball's psi.  Similarly, a human has variables- such as nationality (genetics), weight, gender, and other individual characteristics (body fat percentage, metabolism again) that can affect a person's BAC.  No two humans are alike- even less so than footballs- so it is difficult to determine how they will process alcohol.

Third, Coach Belichick discussed the measurement device- the air gauges.  In order to accurately measure the balls, the gauges need to be accurate.  Before pointing horseshoes at the Patriots, the air gauges better be accurate.  Similarly, whether testing someone's BAC with breath machines, blood machines, or handheld PAS devices, the measuring device better be accurate- or calibrated.  We must watch the watchers.

Fourth, when handling the footballs, no one in the Patriot's locker room- particularly the quarterbacks- could determine one psi difference.  So if Tom Brady was handling a 12.5 psi football, he couldn't identify it from a 11.5 psi football.  This, again, is similar to law enforcement officers that say they are experts at identifying people under the influence.  However, could they tell the difference between someone just above, or just below, .08% BAC?  The answer is most likely not, and studies reflect that answer.

0

Coach Belicheck and the Patriots won a very entertaining and competitive Super Bowl against the Seattle Seahawks.  Deflategate is still outstanding, and the NFL will have a very difficult time proving that someone on the Patriot's team- player or equipment manager- is responsible for the missing 1.5 - 2.0 psi per ball.  Always intelligent, even if controversial, Coach Belichick touched on a number of arguments that can apply to measuring BAC in the human body.  Whether suffering in anguish over a 2nd and goal play call, or celebrating Tom Brady's 4th quarter 14 points, I offer free consultations to discuss the scientific difficulty of any measurements that may affect you.

Continue Reading...

February 28, 2011

North Andover Coach Is Arrested For Child Pornography And May Be Defeated By Search And Seizure Trap – Attorney Sam’s Take

While it is true that the duties of a good coach exist both on the field and off, North Andover 60-year-old high school wrestling coach David Castricone (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) has learned that they do not extend to the locker room.

The locker room of the opposite sex, at least.

That’s how suspicion apparently began in the Defendant’s case. He has been One of the most successful high school wrestling coaches in Massachusetts. The only thing is, there were questions about him. For example, why was he constantly being found in the girl’s locker room?

Police say that information was received last week that prompted a search of the Defendant’s home. According to court documents, the Defendant "got nervous" as police searched his attic. He then told his daughter to leave the kitchen.

The police say that he then waived his rights and told police he had pornography in the attic,.

When asked to describe the pornography, the police say that he stated he had pictures of girls.

A police report filed in court says investigators found pictures of girls who appeared to be unaware that they were being photographed

The Defendant has pleaded not guilty to a charge of possessing child pornography. He was released on $1,500 bail from Lawrence District Court.

He has resigned his position in the school,

Over the past 25 years or so, I have investigated, prosecuted and defended many sex crimes cases.

Lately, there seems to have been an increase in child pornography casesThis should send warning shots over the bow of anyone who regularly works around kids. The message is that any reason for suspicion can be a career and liberty-ender. Let’s face it. Even assuming the Defendant is found to be not guilty at trial, his career at schools, no matter how successful, is over. If the result after trial is different, he is likely to be looking at involuntary Commonwealth housing.

While the school has gone on record to assure parents that none of their kids are in the photographs, the fact is that the rest of us do not really know…yet. The fact that the girls in the pictures look like they are unaware of the camera is not conclusive. The internet is full of pictures that have been posed for in the guise of being unaware of the camera.

Clearly, if girls from the school are in the pictures, the Defendant has a host of problems. Not only will the age-range be easily established, but there will likely be charges other than the fact that they are child pornography. It is illegal to hide a camera in such a location and film unsuspecting people. If not, it might be a different story.

“What do you mean, Sam? I mean, after all, he was nervous when talking to the police about it.”

Wouldn’t you be…even if you had no pornography, illegal or otherwise?

“And he had his daughter leave the room”.

Many men would prefer not to talk pornography with police officers in front of their kids.

By the way, you might notice there is no word of a warrant in this case. It would seem that the Defendant could have refused to talk to the officers or let them into the house.

So why did he?

“Fear of losing his job otherwise?”

Maybe. But then, if the pictures were discovered, that was clearly going to happen anyway.

As we have discussed many times, investigating police officers can be persuasive. Further, some people have greater faith in their abilities to convince police officers than they ought to be…!

You may be one of the cleverest people in the world...but police officers do this for a living. Chances are...they are going to be better at it than you. In other words, you are better off not playing the mind games with investigators. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at the first opportunity and let hin or her advise and, if necessary, defend you.

After all, we handle these situations for a living too.

If you would like it discuss a criminal matter with me, please feel free to call me to arrange a free initial consultation at 617-492-3000.

To view the original story upon part of this blog is based, other than radio (1030 am) accounts, please go to : http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1316916&srvc=rss


View the original article here

Continue Reading...

Links

Developed in partnership with SanFran Coders.

Blogroll

The acronyms DUI, DWI, OMVI and OVI all refer to the same thing: operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The most commonly used terms are DUI, an acronym for Driving Under the Influence, and DWI, an acronym for Driving While Impaired.
© Copyright 2010 - 2015 MY OVI | Developed by San Fran Coders