Showing posts with label Conviction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conviction. Show all posts

April 4, 2015

Sometimes the Treatment for an Oklahoma DUI Conviction Can Seem Like Punishment Itself- Oklahoma DUI Defense

Conviction based on a violation of Oklahoma’s DUI laws carries with it a number of penalties, which vary in severity based on factors such as whether the conviction is for a first-time or subsequent offense or the degree of intoxication. Penalties can include sanctions like fines, community service, jail time, or the requirement to have an ignition interlock device installed in his or her vehicle. The home page of our Oklahoma DUI Defense website contains the text of the law as it pertains to drunk driving and its legal consequences.

One additional consequence of an Oklahoma DUI conviction, receiving a deferred sentence, or losing your Oklahoma driver’s license that may not be as well-known as the penalties mentioned above is the requirement to participate in an alcohol and drug substance evaluation and assessment program. Unlike a term in jail or a monetary penalty, this requirement is not necessarily intended to be a form of punishment as much as a form of treatment. But as we will see on closer examination, sometimes when the criminal justice system seeks to help you the experience can feel like something else entirely.

As a starting point, any alcohol and drug assessment must be performed by persons and organizations that are officially certified to perform them. This certification requires whomever administers the assessment to comply with a multitude of regulatory requirements which can quickly become burdensome and intrusive to the person being evaluated. As an example of this, consider the Alcohol and Drug Substance Abuse Course (ADSAC) participant evaluation, which consists of:

A formal intake interview performed in a clinical setting. Here, you will be required to provide socio-demographic information about yourself as well as answer questions about your personal history. You will also need to complete an Addiction Severity Index, which will be scored.The evaluation will also delve into your driving record, your history of alcohol and drug use, past treatment, and past drug-related arrests.

That may sound tedious to have to undergo, but it is only the beginning. You will also be subject to a “biopsychsocial assessment,” an Orwellian-sounding name for a formal interview that will go into even more minute details of your personal life. The assessor will seek to uncover your medical conditions, your family and social history, your cultural and religious orientations, your marriage history and your living arrangements, your finances, your school background, your health history, any mental health treatments you may have had, even your recreational and leisure time preferences.

This psychological and inquisitory stripping-down of your personal privacy is meant to “help” you, and will be the foundation to determine what kind of specific treatment courses and programs that you will be required to undergo. But you may be excused for being reluctant to undergo such an intimate form of assistance. If you are required to go through one, we have assessors that will treat you with respect for your privacy.

There is no way to get around going through the ADSAC if you have been convicted of an Oklahoma DUI offense or lose your Oklahoma driver’s license.  The only way to avoid it is to not be convicted if you stand accused of such an offense. This, in turn, can depend heavily on your choice of legal counsel to represent you in court.  For more information, contact the Oklahoma DUI Lawyers at the Hunsucker Legal Group.

http://www.ok.gov/odmhsas/Substance_Abuse/DUI_-_Alcohol_and_Drug_Substance_Abuse_Courses__(ADSAC)/index.html

See also Title 450, Chapter 22 of the DPS statute.

Continue Reading...

February 14, 2015

Expungement of a DUI conviction

A New Jersey resident who has a conviction for drunk driving on their criminal record might be eligible for an expungement. Expungement of a criminal conviction is also referred to as having a record 'sealed." When a record of drunk driving is expunged or sealed, the DUI conviction will no longer be publicly accessible.

An individual must meet a number of criteria in order to qualify for an expungement. For instance, a certain number of years must have gone by since the person was convicted for DUI before the record of the event can be expunged. A court may also look into the nature of the drunk driving incident before deciding whether to approve the motion. The individual's criminal record, including any convictions they might have in other states, will also be evaluated.

When a person has a DUI conviction on their record expunged, they are allowed to withhold information about the conviction while filling out apartment, school or job applications. If a potential employer or other party does a public records check, an expunged record will not appear. However, law enforcement, criminal courts and certain government agencies will still be able to view the criminal record that was expunged.

A person who would like to have a DUI conviction on their record expunged might want to seek help from an attorney to ensure that the application is completed properly. If an individual has been denied an expungement, an attorney may be able to look into the reasons for the denial and help the individual to appeal the decision.

Tags: DUI Expungement

Tweet
Continue Reading...

February 12, 2015

Is a Deferred Prosecution recorded as a conviction?

THE DUISEATTLE.COM BLOG : Is a Deferred Prosecution recorded as a conviction? THE DUISEATTLE.COM BLOG Your Community Resource for DUI and Criminal Traffic Defense in Washington State. Writings of Seattle DUI Lawyer and Seattle Criminal Lawyer W. James Kotlowski. A Discussion of Washington State DUI, Physical Control, Reckless Driving, Negligent Driving, Deferred Prosecution, Department of Licensing and Criminal Traffic Law Issues. 20 years of experience. Call or Text - 206.335.2422 for a Free Consultation. HomeArchivesProfileSubscribe Lawyer Walter Kotlowski | Top Attorney DUI W James Kotlowski Attorney at Law PLLC, Attorneys - DUI, Seattle, WA Where can I do my DUI Jail time?What's the maximum jail sentence on a Washington State DUI?Is a Deferred Prosecution recorded as a conviction?What are common DUI reductions in Washington State?How long will my DUI case last?Will I be required to appear at the 5-year hearing on a deferred prosecution? Will a Fourth DUI be a felony in Washington State?How many days do I have to request a DOL Hearing?Will a DUI probation violation suspend my license?Will my alcohol evaluation be accessible by the public? Search OFFICEContact Information
Law Office of W. James Kotlowski PLLC 1411 Fourth Avenue,Suite 1130Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: (206) 395-2004james@duiseattle.com www.DUISeattle.com
FREE ONLINE CASE EVALUATION
January 2015 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat         1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AboutDISCLAIMERPLEASE NOTE:This blog is made available by the lawyer publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The linked sites are not under the control of the Law Office of W. James Kotlowski PLLC and the Office is not responsible for the contents of any linked site. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. W. James Kotlowski is licensed to practice law in the State of Washington only.ArchivesJanuary 2015December 2014November 2014October 2014September 2014August 2014July 2014June 2014May 2014April 2014More...

Categories20 day hearing notice2012 Boating opening day2013 Boating Under the Influence2nd deferred prosecution60 days ABOUT THE AUTHORAlcohol ReportAlcohol/Drug EvaluationalcoholismArraignmentAttorney FeesBAC LimitBailBail Bond CompanyBail HearingBoating chargesBoating under the influencebreath test machineBreath Test RecordsBUICanadaChanges to the Law Choosing an AttorneyCommunity Serviceconditions of releaseCost of DUICourt CostsCourt ProcessCourt Recordscoverage areaCriminal History (DCH)Current AffairsCustodydeferred prosecutiondeferred sentenceDifferences in JurisdictionDifferent JurisdictionsDOL administrative hearingDOL HearingDOL IssuesDOL SubpoenasDraegerDrivers LicenseDriving TestDUI arrestDUI arrest DUI arrest videoDUI BailDUI BlogsDUI Deferred ProsecutionDUI filingDUI JailDUI newsDUI Payment PlansDUI preventive measuresDUI ProbationDUI Probation violationsDWLS/3EHDEHMEmergency Vehicles Employer ExemptionevidenceExpert Expunge DUIFelony DUIfinesGamesHelpful TipsHiring an attorneyHit & RunIgnition Interlock LicenseIIDIILImmigration ConsequencesIMPOUNDImpound LawInterstate drivers license compactinvestigationJailjurisdictionJurorsJury Trialmental health deferredMissed DOL Hearing NVOLOccupational LicenseOfficeOne a lifetimeonline case evaluationPayment PlansPBTPDRPlea BargainPractical TipsPre-arrestpre-trial hearingsPrescription Drugsprobable cause to arrestProbable Cause to StopProbable Cause to Stop ProbationProbation Probation OfficerProbation ViolationPunched LicensequestionsRALJReckless DrivingReinstate LicenseRelapseRestricted Licenserevoked deferred prosecutionRight to AttorneyRoad BlocksSCRAMSeattle Municipal CourtSentencingSentencing OptionsSOCSOLSPDSpecial Series: DUI 2012 Law ChangesSR-22 InsuranceState ID statementsStatementssuspension period expirestalk to policeTow feesTracking InfractionsTraffic SchoolTravelTravel to CanadaTreatmentVacate DUIVacate recordvideoviolation of conditions or releasewaiveWarrantsWashington State DUI NewsWashington State Ferry Witnesseswork releaseDUI Newshttp://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Senator-talks-about-DUI-charge--289625721.html
SCOTUS to hear Colorado DUI blood test case « Hot Air
Video emerges of Texas judge who failed sobriety test and DUI charges dropped | Daily Mail Online

Beer batter led to DUI? 5 craziest crimes of week
http://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2014/12/11/indiana-judge-resigning-after-dui-clarksville-mickey-weber/20239393/
Judge on trial: Cynthia Imperato's DUI and reckless driving case will be heard by a jury starting Dec. 16 - Sun Sentinel
SEE IT: Texas judge stumbles through DUI sobriety test - NY Daily News
New award recognizes DUI officers doing exceptional work | www.kirotv.com
This victim impact panel is for young people charged with DUI - Chicago Tribune
WASHINGTON STATE DUI LEGAL RESOURCES AA Meetings
Alcohol Drug Evaluation (Seattle Metro)
Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device
Alcohol/Drug Treatment (Western WA)
Alcohol/Drug Treatment (payment plans available)
Court Date: Seattle Municipal Court
Court Date: Washington State Courts
Criminal Record: Washington State Patrol
DOL Driver License Questions
DOL Driver Licensing forms
Driver License Status: Real Time
DUI Victims Panel
ECR -King County District Court
Ignition Interlock License Application
Insurance SR 22
Issaquah Jail and Inmate Info
King County District Court
King County District Court Online Payments
Lynnwood Municipal Online Payments
Traffic School: NTSI
Vacate Traffic Conviction Record
Vern Fonk Insurance (SR-22)
Warrant? Procedures - King County District Court
Washington Snohomish County Jail Register
Washington State, King County Jail Register
CELEBRITY DUISDetroit Lions' Nick Fairley rejects plea offer in DUI case | AL.com
Yolanda Foster Opens Up About Daughter Bella Hadid's Shocking and Disappointing DUI Arrest | E! Online
Manziel’s bodyguard arrested for DUI, while driving Manziel’s car | ProFootballTalk
Snooki's Husband Jionni LaValle Pleads Guilty to DUI After Wedding - Us Weekly
Rapper Xzibit Arrested for Alleged DUI Shortly After Getting Married - Yahoo
Amanda Bynes pleads no contest to 'wet reckless' in DUI case - latimes.com
Justin Bieber Reportedly Rejects DUI Plea Deal | Celebrity-gossip.net
Justin Bieber DUI Case Update: Plea Deal Rejected | ExtraTV.com
Vikings LB Henderson arrested again for DWI - Yahoo Sports
Motion to dismiss Marshawn Lynch DUI case denied | Seattle Seahawks | The Olympian
DAILY READINGCapitol Hill Times | Serving Capitol Hill and First Hill Since 1926 - Seattle, WA
Dallas Morning News
Front | Tri-City Herald : Mid-Columbia news
Madison Park Times | Serving East-Central Seattle Since 1983 - Seattle, WA
Melbourne Herald Sun
New York Times
Politico.com
Queen Anne & Magnolia News - Seattle, WA
Redmond Reporter - Local News, Sports, Entertainment
Saint John Telegraph Journal
Subscribe to this blog's feedLEGAL REFERENCE Arizona Criminal Lawyer and Phoenix DUI Laws and Criminal Defense
bulk.resource.org
Business.gov - Official Business Link to the U.S. Government
Data.Seattle.Gov | Seattle's Data Site
General Name Change Information
King County Bar Association
Law Dictionary
Legal Research, Casemaker
Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon State Bar
OTHER LEGAL BLOGS/SITES Avvo Blog
Civl Litigation Attorney
Employment Law Blog
Family Law: Collaborative Divorce (Eastern Washington)
Index of Legal Blogs
Professional Licensing Issues
Real Estate/Estate Planning Attorney
« What are common DUI reductions in Washington State? |Main| What's the maximum jail sentence on a Washington State DUI? »

January 27, 2015 Is a Deferred Prosecution recorded as a conviction?No. If you do a Deferred Prosecution for a DUI in Washington State it is not a conviction at any pont. (unlike a deferred sentence). However, the Deferred Prosecution does remain in the Court and Department of Licensing (DOL) records. 

Posted at 05:14 PM in deferred prosecution | Permalink

Reblog (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553da03ec883301bb07e275bb970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is a Deferred Prosecution recorded as a conviction?:

THE DUISEATTLE.COM BLOG Powered by Typepaddocument.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js'%3E%3C/script%3E"));COMSCORE.beacon({ c1: 2, c2: "6035669", c3: "", c4: "http://duiseattleblog.typepad.com/dui_seattle/2015/01/is-a-deferred-prosecution-recorded-as-a-conviction.html", c5: "", c6: "", c15: ""});
Continue Reading...

February 7, 2015

A Physical Control Conviction Is Not A Prior Offense

physical controlA physical control conviction does not count as a “prior offense” for purposes of enhancement.  This principle is spelled out in case law and in statute.  R.C. 4511.181 sets forth the offenses that count as prior convictions.  It does not list a violation of physical control (R.C. 4511.194) as a predicate offense.  It does not matter if the prior conviction  was charged under R.C. 4511.194 or as a violation of a municipal ordinance. This is set forth at R.C. 4511.182(A) and in State v. Schultz, 2008-Ohio-4325 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. Cuyahoga County 2008).

Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in the Miami Valley and throughout Ohio. He has the credentials and the experience to win your physical control or DUI case and has made himself Dayton’s choice for drunk driving defense. Contact Charles Rowland by phone at (937) 318-1384 or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263). If you need assistance after hours, call the 24/7 DUI Hotline at (937) 776-2671. You can have DaytonDUI at your fingertips by downloading the DaytonDUI Android App or have DaytonDUI sent directly to your mobile device by texting DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500. Follow DaytonDUI on Facebook, @DaytonDUI on Twitter, YouTube, Tumblr, Pheed and Pintrest or get RSS of the Ohio DUI blog. You can email CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or visit his office at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

“All I do is DUI defense.”

Fairborn, Dayton, Springfield,Kettering,Vandalia,Xenia, Miamisburg,Huber Heights, Springboro, Oakwood,Beavercreek, Centerville

Continue Reading...

January 16, 2015

Consequences of a TN DUI Conviction – Part 2

In this week’s podcast, host and Knoxville DUI attorney Steve Oberman presents Part 2 of a podcast series explaining some of the Collateral Consequences that result from a Tennessee DUI conviction.   The purpose of this series is to summarize some, but certainly not all, of the lesser known consequences one faces if convicted of DUI.  This episode focuses on the potential effects of a Tennessee Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in Tennessee on parental rights and immigration status.

Our Knoxville, TN DUI lawyers are also happy to answer any questions you may have about these and other issues surrounding a Tennessee DUI charge and the resulting penalties.  Feel free to call our office at (865) 249-7200.  For issues surrounding parental rights and the status of non-citizens, our attorneys can also refer you to Tennessee attorneys knowledgeable in these areas of law.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Additional information about the Collateral Consequences of a Tennessee DUI conviction, as well as the Tennessee DUI penalties mandated by law can be found by visiting the website of Knoxville DUI attorneys, Oberman & Rice, at www.tndui.com and www.duiknoxville.com.  Part 1 of this series, Collateral Consequences of a TN DUI Conviction – Part 1, can also be heard by clicking here.

DUI conviction, Knoxville DUI Attorney, Knoxville DUI Lawyer, Tennessee DUI and Insurance, Tennessee DUI Consequence, Tennessee DUI Consequences, Tennessee DUI Lawyer, Tennessee DUI Penalties, TN DUI Immigration, TN DUI Non-Citizen, TN Parental Rights

This entry was posted on Monday, March 26th, 2012, 8:55 am and is filed under Podcasts. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Continue Reading...

January 1, 2015

Seventh Circuit Overturns Conviction in Fake Stash House Case

entrapment

In a decision issued yesterday, the Seventh Circuit held that the defendant in a fake “stash house robbery” case was entitled to present an entrapment defense to the jury. The case came from what was essentially a set-up by the government: they created a fake stash house, and used a paid informant to recruit the defendant as part of a crew to rob the house.

Prior to the case going to trial, the judge ruled that the defendant could not present the defense of entrapment, holding that there was not enough evidence to show the government induced the crime, or that the defendant lacked the predisposition to commit it.

To use an entrapment defense, the defendant has to who two things:

That he lacked the predisposition to commit the crime; andHe would not have attempted to commit the crime without the government inducing him into committing it.

It’s important to note that the Seventh Circuit didn’t rule that the defendant was entrapped, just that he should have been able to argue to the jury that he was entrapped. From the opinion:

Here, Mayfield proffered enough evidence to justify giving the issue to the jury. He provided some facts showing that he was not predisposed to commit the charged crimes prior to being approached by the informant, and he narrated a story of substantial government inducement going beyond the mere offer of a chance to rob a stash house. His story may be false or unpersuasive, but that’s for the jury to decide. The district court erred by crediting the government’s evidence over Mayfield’s and precluding the entrapment defense before trial.
We vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.

photo credit: Nuwandalice via photopin cc

Sam began his legal career at one of the largest law firms in Florida, working directly for national insurance companies and health care conglomerates. This valuable experience gives him a definitive edge in knowing how insurers will fight against compensating you for your claim. He then moved to one of the top statewide plaintiff’s firms, gaining insight into insurance coverage and insurance bad faith matters. He joined with Brett Metcalf to begin Metcalf Harden in 2014. Sam is a member of the Florida Justice Association, the American Association for Justice, the Tampa Bay Trial Lawyers Association, and the Hillsborough County Bar Association. He is licensed to practice in all Florida state courts, as well as the federal Middle District of Florida. Sam lives in Lutz with his wife Kristin, a Tampa native, and son Robbie.

Read all posts by Sam Harden
Continue Reading...

December 8, 2014

Can a California DUI Conviction Get You Deported?

A California DUI conviction can have severe consequences. For non-citizens, however, the consequences of a California DUI conviction can be particularly devastating because it can lead to deportation from this country.   

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), specifically section 237, sets for the crimes for which a person can be deported. Although a California DUI is not specifically included in this section as a deportable offense, other categories of deportable offenses are listed which a California DUI conviction can fall under. Those categories include aggravated felonies, crimes of moral turpitude, and offenses involving controlled substances.

Prior to 2004, a DUI was considered a crime of violence and therefore deportable under the category of aggravated felonies. However, the United States Supreme Court in the case of Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1, held that DUIs are not, without other aggravating circumstances, deportable. Specifically, the Court held that a crime of violence is one that includes a “higher degree of intent than negligent or merely accidental conduct.” A DUI, on the other hand, is a general intent crime because it involves negligent conduct rather than a specific intent to cause harm.

If a DUI is not a crime of violence, then may it be a crime of moral turpitude?

Although vague, the phrase “moral turpitude” has been interpreted as shocking the public conscience or acts that are considered wrong by society’s standards. In determining whether a crime shocks the public conscious, the court will look to aggravating circumstances such as a “guilty intent.” As I stated before, a simple DUI, by itself, does not involve any specific intent to cause harm or even commit a crime and therefore cannot be a crime of moral turpitude.

If, however, the DUI is coupled with another offense that does require a “guilty intent,” the DUI conviction could be considered a deportable offense. For example, if someone is arrested for driving under the influence while their license is suspended, it may be considered a crime of moral turpitude if the person knew their license was suspended and drove drunk anyways.

Lastly, a California DUI conviction can be deportable if it involves a controlled substance. As I’m sure you’re aware having read previous posts on this blog, a California DUI does not necessarily involve alcohol. A DUI can involve both legal and illegal drugs. However, being under the influence of only drugs listed in the Controlled Substances Act can cause a DUI to become a deportable offense. The drugs listed in the Controlled Substances act can be found at http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/c_cs_alpha.pdf.

Share This entry was posted on Monday, November 3rd, 2014 at 7:25 am and is filed under Duiblog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Continue Reading...

July 17, 2012

Tampa Bay Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Ninth DUI Conviction

By guest-writer

A Tampa Bay resident who has reportedly been a binge drinker for more than 30 years has somehow survived long enough to tally his ninth DUI conviction, according to an incredible report from the Tampa Bay Times.

And a Florida judge who had little sympathy for a man with a clear disease has sentenced him to 10 years in prison for his latest brush with the law, in which the man was caught driving drunk despite the fact that his license had been permanently revoke.

According to sources, 48-year-old James Vernon Smith pleaded with Judge Kimberly Fernandez for mercy before she announced his sentence.

Wearing an orange jumpsuit and clad in shackles around his wrists and ankles, Smith asked the judge not to throw him in jail, and claimed, “I’m more than just a drunk. I’m a son, I’m a brother, I’m a father and there’s still good left in me.”

Despite this plea, Judge Fernandez said the man’s conduct “simply demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the law,” which led to her decision to levy a 10-year jail sentence and five years or probation.

After he is released from jail, Smith will also receive psychiatric and alcohol evaluations, although his DUI lawyer argued that Smith should receive more treatment immediately, rather than jail time.

In the words of Smith’s attorney, the “reality is that he will go sit in a prison cell for the next eight years and he won’t receive the help he needs.”

The attorney also observed that a mental health counselor employed by the state said that Smith suffers from several mental disorders which went undiagnosed until last week but have had a significant impact on Smith’s behavior.

In fact, the mental health counselor also observed that Smith’s mental illnesses likely contributed to his binge drinking, and that the man needs serious psychiatric help in order to remedy his problems.

While the judge listened respectfully to the lawyer’s arguments, she was ultimately swayed by the extreme disregard for DUI laws displayed by Smith, and decided that a more severe punishment was warranted.

In addition to his time in jail, Smith will also be required to perform up to 100 hours of community service and he will have to give speeches to younger people about the dangers of driving while intoxicated.

Sources say that Smith lives in Louisiana and works an underwater welder. He also has two daughters who live in Florida.


View the original article here

Continue Reading...

January 10, 2012

Judge Overrules DUI Conviction for Deaf Man

By guest-writer

In a victory for deaf rights advocates, a judge In Washington state recently overturned a DUI charge leveled against a deaf man who had not had the aid of a sign language interpreter during his initial court appearance.

The ruling brings an end to five years of legal wrangling for 33-year-old William Kral, who had spent years appealing his past conviction on DUI charges despite the fact that he did not have a trained interpreter assisting him during his DUI arraignment.

According to a report from The News Tribune in Tacoma, Washington, the nightmare began for Kral in December 2005, when he was arrested in Benton County, Washington on suspicion of drunk driving and driving with a suspended license.

However, when the deaf man was arraigned after his arrest, the courtroom did not provide a properly trained interpreter. According to Kral, the interpreter told him a document was simply a continuance of the man’s case.

The document, however, waived Kral’s right to a speedy trial. Due to the miscommunication, Kral signed a piece of paper that severely limited his rights. As a result, Kral allegedly signed a paper waiving his constitutional right to a speedy trial without adequately understanding the nature of the document.

At the time, the court overlooked this disadvantage, and eventually found Kral guilty of driving drunk. Kral had to serve a nine-month prison sentence, which included three months in an alcohol treatment program, and had to pay more than $4,600 in fines.

Over the course of the next five years, Kral struggled through several appeals, in which he was aided by several different court-appointed attorneys.

Finally, in August, an appellate court ruled that Kral had been denied his constitutional rights when he was not provided with a properly trained translator. The judge sent the case back to the trial court for a reversal of the decision.

This final reversal occurred last week, when the trial court admitted its wrongdoing by throwing out Kral’s conviction and ordering that the state repay the $4,600 he had paid in fines.

Such an action, however, offers little solace for Kral, who cannot recover the nine months he spent behind bars. To make matters worse, Kral’s prison sentence forced him to lose his construction job and his girlfriend at the time.

In addition, despite Kral’s painful ordeal, the district court seems to have failed to learn its lesson. In the recent hearing, Kral had to provide his own professionally-trained interpreter because the court still did not offer one to deaf defendants.

Thus, while Kral won his individual battle, it came at a great personal cost, and it appears that the court has yet to change its discriminatory practices.

Nevertheless, Kral and his attorney hope that the decision will eventually help improve the experience of other deaf defendants in Washington courts.


View the original article here

Continue Reading...

January 6, 2012

How to Save Yourself from a False DUI Conviction

Save yourself from a False Pennsylvania DUI Save yourself from a False Pennsylvania DUI

Over the holidays, many Pennsylvania drivers will be stopped by police for DUI.  Law enforcement is a human endeavor and police officers are prone to mistakes which can lead to false arrest.  As citizens fit is up to you to arm yourself with knowledge of the law so you can protect yourself against a false DUI.

This is why The McShane Firm has put together a guide to help educate you on your rights and how you should use them.  Please read: What to Do if You’re pulled over for DUI in PA.

If you need professional advice on a DUI or criminal matter, please contact the Pennsylvania DUI attorneys at The McShane Firm at 1-866-MCSHANE.


View the original article here

Continue Reading...

February 2, 2011

Boston’s Appeals Court Overturns Sex Crime Conviction In Prostitution Case Involving A Juvenile- Attorney Sam’s Take


Samuel Goldberg has been a Massachusetts criminal defense attorney for 20 years. Prior to that, he was a New York state prosecutor. He has published various articles regarding the practice of criminal law and frequently provides legal analysis on radio and television, appearing on outlets such as the Fox News Channel, Court TV, MSNBC and The BBC Network.
To speak to Sam about a criminal matter call 617-492-3000.

Posted On: January 12, 2011 by Samuel Goldberg

Here’s one for the sex trade! In the past, we have discussed many times the various, and in my opinion, faulty rationales for keeping prostitution illegal. One of those rationales has been that prostitutes are, per se, victims. They are exploited and forced to perform sex acts for money. The thought seems to have been that being a prostitute is definitional of losing one’s will and performing the evil deeds by force.

Well, the Massachusetts Appeals Court has ruled against this equation. It has thrown out the convictions of a pimp and a madam (hereinafter, the “Defendants”), ruling that the couple did not lure a homeless and drug-addicted teenager into prostitution because the 16-year-old runaway had sold her body for money in the past.

The court did, however, let stand the Defendants’ convictions for deriving support from prostitution and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

The allegations in the case were that the Defendants drove the teen to the hotel where she met an undercover detective and agreed to engage in sex for $280, according to court records. Using a ruse, the officer convinced the teen to leave the hotel before any sexual acts occurred. The teen then apparently handed the cash the Defendants, who were waiting in the hotel parking lot

The court found, “We think that the language of the statute is plain and unambiguous and that it clearly expresses the Legislature's intent to penalize a person for inducing a minor, who is not then so engaged, to engage in the commercial enterprise of prostitution by offering for hire his or her body for indiscriminate sexual activity’’.

As a Boston sex crimes criminal defense attorney for over twenty years, not to mention previous years as a prosecutor, I have been involved in a number of cases involving prostitution.

I agree that it is worth prosecuting those who force anyone into prostitution, or aid children in engaging in the trade is worthwhile. However, the attempts to combat those situations are diluted and tainted when we open the broad scope of assuming that every prostitute is a victim and must be saved from themselves, if not everyone else. In fact, it perverts the very effort of female dignity assuming that a woman could never make such a choice herself with sound reason.

In this case, the Appeals Court did not make new law or break new ground. It did, however, enforce the law as it was meant when it was written, rather than simply cave in to public sentiment.

Playing the devil’s advocate (something most people would say I do every day in my line of work), there is an interesting argument that could be made against the court’s ruling. As you know, in matters sexual, we tend to believe that a minor cannot consent to sex. Under the law, it does not even matter if the sex-mate knows that the minor is under age. In fact, it does not even matter if the minor lied and “proved” she was of age.

Sex with a minor, with or without her preferred consent, is rape. Pure and simple.

Couldn’t one argue that, since the prostitute here was a minor, she had to be induced, because any participation with her in the sex trade is manipulating her because she has no ability to consent?

After all, under the law, any customer who had sex with a minor should be not only guilty of prostitution, but also rape.

Just saying…..!

The language and rationale of the laws and how our law enforcement agencies choose to implement them is a pretty thick and, often, confusing forest.

This is why you need an experienced criminal defense attorney to help light your way through it.

If you would like to discuss my lighting your way, please feel to call me to arrange a free initial consultation at 617-492-3000.

To view the original story in which parts of this blog were based, please go to : http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2011/01/by_john_r_ellem_29.html


View the original article here

Continue Reading...

Links

Developed in partnership with SanFran Coders.

Blogroll

The acronyms DUI, DWI, OMVI and OVI all refer to the same thing: operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The most commonly used terms are DUI, an acronym for Driving Under the Influence, and DWI, an acronym for Driving While Impaired.
© Copyright 2010 - 2015 MY OVI | Developed by San Fran Coders